Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01026
Original file (PD 2014 01026.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD-2014-01026
BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS  BOARD DATE: 20141009
SEPARATION DATE: 20080830


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflect that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty Marine LCpl/E-3 (3521/Motor Transport Mechanic) medically separated for hallux limitus and bilateral first metatarsal head metatarsalgia, or bilateral “great toe” condition. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was placed on limited duty and was eventually referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The hallux limitis condition, characterized as “enthesopathy of ankle and tarsus, unspecified, and hallux rigidus” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The PEB adjudicated “hallux limitus” as unfitting rating each great toe separately at 10% with a 20% combined rating, which included the bilateral factor. The PEB determined “bilateral first metatarsal head metatarsalgia” as category II (contributing to the unfitting condition). The PEB used the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Conditions have become much worse leaving me unable to work.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting hallux limitus is addressed below. The category II condition of the bilateral first metatarsal head metatarsalgia will be considered by the board as part of the unfitting condition. No additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.

The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. Post-separation evidence is probative to the Board’s recommendations only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation.



 RATING COMPARISON :


Service IPEB – Dated 20080718
 VA - (6 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Hallux Limitus 5281 10% Residuals, Left Foot Fracture with Residual Scar of Great Toe 5299-5279 10% 20080910
Hallux Limitus 5281 10% Status Post Bunionectomy, Right Foot with Residual Scar of Great Toe 5280 10% 20080910
Bilateral First Metatarsal Head Metatarsalgia Cat II No VA Entry
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 6
Combined: 20% (incl bilateral factor)
 Combined: 40%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20090212 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Bilateral Hallux Limitus Condition. According to the MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) and treatment records, the CI experienced chronic right foot pain since recruit training. Podiatry evaluation diagnosed hallux valgus (great toe abnormally angled with a painful bony prominence) and fracture of the sesamoid bone (attached to one of the tendons for the great toe) and recommended corrective surgery. On 10 May 2007, the CI underwent bunionectomy (removal of excess bone at the base of the toe and correction of the toe angle) and removal of the painful sesamoid bone. The CI injured the left foot in November 2007 and developed similar symptoms in the left foot. On 23 January 2008, the CI underwent left foot surgery including shaving of excess bone at the base of the great toe (he did not undergo bunionectomy) and removal of a painful sesamoid bone at the great toe. According to the MEB NARSUM performed on 22 April 2008, the CI continued to experience pain at the surgical sites which limited running, jumping and prolonged standing. On examination, dorsiflexion of the great toes was limited to 30 degrees (normal is approximately 60 degrees), with pain at 30 degrees. The remainder of the foot and ankle examination was normal. The MEB NARSUM concluded with diagnoses of hallux limitus (decreased motion of the toe) and metatarsal head metatarsalgia (pain at the base of the great toe). The VA Compensation and Pension examination performed on 10 September 2008, a week after separation, recorded foot pain aggravated by activity. The examiner noted the CI could function (standing and walking) with medication. The CI did not require any additional orthotic supports in his shoes. On examination, the gait was normal. There was painful motion of the great toes, but the remainder of the foot examination was normal (plantar foot non-tender, normal alignment). X-rays of both feet noted the right foot bunionectomy but were otherwise reported as normal.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated each foot 10% coded 5281 (hallux rigidus). The VA also rated each foot 10% but using different VASRD diagnostic codes (right foot coded 5280 hallux valgus and the left foot coded 5299-5279 metatarsalgia). The Board noted that except for pain and limitation of motion of the great toe, the remainder of the foot examination was normal. The Board noted that no other VASRD diagnostic codes more nearly described the condition than the three chosen by the PEB and VA. All three diagnostic codes used by the PEB and the VA (5279, 5280, and 5281) provide for a maximum rating of 10%. There were no other coding options which better described the condition and resulted in a higher rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence, and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the right and left hallux rigidus condition.

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the right and left hallux rigidus condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140219, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record








                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW
BOARDS

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) CORB ltr dtd 8 Apr 15

In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandums, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individual’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board:
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN


                                                      XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                            Assistant General Counsel
                  (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00711

    Original file (PD2009-00711.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Following treatment including two surgeries and two periods of limited duty, the CI did not respond adequately to perform within his rating and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Left Foot Condition. I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and, for the reasons set forth in reference (b), approve the recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review Mr. XXXX’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either his characterization of separation or in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00503

    Original file (PD 2012 00503.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Should the Board judge that any contested condition was most likely incompatible with the specific duty requirements, a disability rating will be recommended IAW the VASRD and based on the degree of disability evidenced at separation. The range-of-motion (ROM) of the feet was noted to be “good.” X-rays were normal other than bilateral mild hammer toes of the second and third digits; this is a separate condition from the bilateral hallux valgus. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02003

    Original file (PD-2013-02003.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01515

    Original file (PD-2013-01515.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    An L3 profile was issued for bilateral hallux limitus (big toes limited motion and pain) on 13 November 2003 with restrictions of no running, jumping, prolonged standing, climbing or crawling on or under military equipment.The MEB NARSUM dated 12 December 2003 indicated the CI underwent additional surgery to remove the hardware and correction of her right foot from the surgery performed in September 2000. Her persistent hip pain was aggravated by the same activities as her back and limited...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00295

    Original file (PD2012-00295.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The right great toe condition was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as two diagnoses (“joint pain, localized right 1st MTP [metatarsal-phalangeal] joint” and “hallux limitus of the right great toe”) characterized as separate medically unacceptable conditions IAW AR 40-501. SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6040.44 is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01329

    Original file (PD-2012-01329.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA Compensation & Pension (C&P) examination noted that the CI could not run at all without reproducing pain in both great toes and that he could not stand on his feet for more than 3 hours at a time and walking produced a limping gait. The VA coded the left great toe condition 5284‐5281 (5284 Foot injuries, other: Moderate with 5281 Hallux rigidus, unilateral, severe) and rated at 10%. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01930

    Original file (PD-2013-01930.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The foot condition, characterized as “chronic right foot pain following bunion surgery,” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01246

    Original file (PD-2012-01246.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. The PEB rated the left toe pain condition 0% coded 5003. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Chronic Pain Left Hallux...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00755

    Original file (PD2011-00755.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW Right Foot Condition. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00119

    Original file (PD-2014-00119.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20070304 The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Right Foot Pain5299-528010%S/P Surgery Hallux Valgus Right Foot52800%20070510S/p Surgical Scar Hallux Valgus Right...